'Account of Proceedings in Parliament (1628)'
Norfolk Record Office, HMN 7/307, 772X8, ff. 176r-176v
At [th]e Parl[iament] begun Jan[uary] [th]e 1628
Left margin:
J{a}n 21
The first thing insisted vpon was what Innovations
Their first walk into publiq[e] affairs was to be like good husbands to see if ther
fences were firme for the Last P[arliament] having made a gallant hedge between
Royal Prerog[ative] & Pop[ular] Liberty their first care was to see wheth what incroach
ments had been made vpon it & appointed a Com[m]ittee to to view the scathes
who gave account that not onely several irruptions and gapps had been
made therein but also that it had been new printed with such an additio[n]
as was dis would gangrene the hole masse if not prevented. This inquisition taking notice of the vndue enfer extorting Ton[n]age & Poundage vrged his
M[ajesty] to declare himself to the house Jun[e] 24 that those levyes were not
made as filing them vp vpon the score of his just Rights but onely as the
products of his instant exigents disavowing vtterly any legal capa-city in him to impose them without Parl[iament] concessio[n] & withal desiring
they would {hush} all {dolates} relating to them by a {present condescension}
and that since he had disclaimed the right it might be a motive to obs
teme the favour. Their next walke was into Religion which was p[re]sented obst in a very lapsing & tottering condition that Popery
while the lawes were layd to sleep began to repullulate & grow a
fresh That Papists were not onely tolerated but countenanced
& graced That Armmianisme which is but parboyld Popery
began to domineere notwithstanding it was declared against by
the Lambeth Articles which were sent by K[ing] James to the Synod of
Dort and to Ireland as the doctrine of [th]e Church of England
that the faitors of that ipinion rode safe vnder the lee of Royal
favour, wheras [th]e sound and {oathedon} were vnder inglorious disdein
the Constat of this was that Mr Montague a man complained against in
open P[arliament] was not withstanding by the sollicitasio[n] of {nol} both pardoned his preceding errour, but
advanced fines to the see of Chichester. And that Dr Mannering who
was sensured also for high misdomeanours had reingratiated himself
and obteined his Pardon & that there
For Constat of Recusants p[re]vailing it was proved that
That in Dublin[th]e City of Dublin there were lately erected 13 houses
(peculiar to Jesuites & Friers) more in number then there are Protestant
Churches.
That in Scotland they have lately been very insolent & turbulent
That in some countyes of England they are multiplyd to the product some thousands of families now then in Q[ueen] El[izabeth] her time
Right margin:
Putet by their m[ar]k
& c.
That in Clarkenwel there was a discovery of a Colledge of iu Jesui
tes & Preists whereof 10 were apprehended & 3 were endited for Preists ({and the rest of Preminm[en]t}) whereof one was condemned and though direct treason was proved
against them & one condemned yet the night before Excecution he
was repreived by warrantth Order from the (R{???} who {???} an order forLord Ch[ief] Iustice hide who said he the Council table did it by order fro[m] his Maj[es]ty
The maine breach into [th]e Subjects Liberty was by divers Customers
who seased several M[e]rchants goods for Ton[n]age & p[oun]dage vpon which the
Custom[e]rs were questioned and the K[ing] resigned vp the interest in them
other ways then of free gift (though his warrant for the {???} of the
sayes {} expressly they are a Principal Revenue of o[u]r crown) but to
indemnify the Customers who he avowed acted onely by his com[m]and
he requested the Parl[iament] woud compare the difference by some expedi-ent of honour to him and saftey to them. But the house stood so
stiff to the maintenance of their own rights as K[ing] much {incensed}
wished to aj adjorn.
In religion they complained of several abuses Great complaints being exhibetedsome relating to against the spreading 1. of Arminianisme then of Popery. For Arminianisme
it was complained that not withstanding the Resolution of the ArchBis[hop] of
C[anterbury] & other Reverend & learned princes Byshops & divines assembled at Lambeth
1595 on purpose to declare their opinions concerning the some of the 39
Articles in those Particulars vnto which Articles the ArchB[ishop] of York & all
his Prov[ince] did agree. , That notwithstanding the suffrage of our Brition Divines sent by K[ing] J[ames] to the Synod at Dort. And published by com[m]and
That notwithstandin the / That notwithstanding those Articles of Lambeth
were sent by K[ing] James first to the Synod at Dort by King James as the Doctrine of our
ch[urch] and there asserted by the suffrage of our British divines, And again to the Convoca-tion in Ireland there to be inserted amongst the Articles of the Religion
establist there. That notwithstanding several de Recantations
Censures formaly enjoyned and inflicted vpon the spreaders of that
doctrine yet the maintainers of these points did dare to publish both
by the presse & pulpit their {tenets}P2/ they were not onely sheltered
under the Lee of Royal favour but by the power & prevalence of the
Byshops of Winchester & London advanced /1/ somethey were pardoned formerly
censured in open Parliament as Mountague Cozen, Manwaring, & Sibthorpe werehad by the procuremeant & {collinitative} of Note Bysh[op] of Winch[ester] & the Earle of Dorcest
obtenied their pardons under the great Seal and others wereand those very men with others not only &c.
to the great disanimation of the tru p[ro]fesors. The Complaints referring to Oblique Popery were judacisesthe obtruting of the uncontrouled preaching of several points thereofwarninge; that was by Mountague, Cozens & [th]e B[ishop] of Gloucester, the {endeviour} obtruding of divers superstitious ceremonies by the Prelates as warring of
Altars and placing the holy table Altarwise the {L___ing dopping & cringing} towards
it the standing up at Gloria Patri things not enjoyned by any authoritqe
act of State
Relating to Popery direct. The extraordinary fructification both in Ireland and Engl[and] thereof, that in
Dublin the chri Metroperlis of Ireland where lately all resorted to Church
now there were erected more houses for Masse preists & Friers to officiat
in than there were Parochial churches, that in some Counties of Engl[and]
where there were few or none during Q[ueen] Eliz[abeth] her time there were now
above 2000. That they there was a Colledge of Jesuits erected at Clerk-enwell who had there a Chappell and Library and other Roomes of necessaary
accomodation with houshold vtensills of marked with {+ S}. and as by their bookes of
accoumpt appeared had in revenue 300l {&} an allowed them by the subscription if diverse
Recusants subscribers That 10 of these were apprehended and indited
3 of Treason the rest of {Pre???} And that although plain treason was
Proved against them at the Sessions yet by the artiface of the 2 L[ord] chief
Justices Hide & Richard suppassing our Kings evedence nothing was done against them, onely one was con-demned and the day before Execution was repreived by a warrant
from th[e] Ch[ief] Justice Hide: That the great resort to {M???} at Som[erset] house
was so great so frequent so openly connived at and the penality if{state???}
through his M[ajesty] if over great indulgence so dispenced with as amounted in theable totel to litle lesse then in toleratio[n].
Left margin:
virtue onely quan quantifyes nobility and gives it its dimensions
A lea[r]nd man but no good scholler
{???}
Introduction
No introduction.
Manuscript
Norfolk Record Office, HMN 7/307, 772X8, ff. 176r-176v
Languages: English
Creation date: 1628
Authors
No authors.
Other Witnesses
No witnesses
Seventeenth Century Print Exemplars
No bibliography
Modern Print Exemplars
No bibliography
Selected Criticism
No bibliography
Downloads
Keywords (Text Type)
Keywords (Text Topics)
- parliament
Transcribed by:
Helen Busby (Transcription Volunteer), Beth Southard (Transcription Volunteer)