'The Arguments Exhibited in Parliament Regarding Contempt in Chancery (c.1572)'
Norfolk Record Office, RYE 20, Item 2, ff. 1r-2r
The Arguments exhibited by the Lord Keeper S[i]r Nicholas Bacon in Parliament, proving the Noblemens p[er]sons to be Attacheable for contempt com[m]itted by them in the Queenes Ma[jes]ties Court of Chancery, disobeying the decrees in that Court, which came in question vpon an attachement ordered out of the same Court to the Sheriff of Norff[olk] to attach the body of the Lord Cromwell for disobeying a decree made in the said Court betweene one Taverner plaintiff and the said Lord Cromwell defend[an]t, which Attachment so executed by the said Sheriff, and the body of the said Lord Crumwell brought prisoner in the said Court of Chancery /
First hee saith that by a contempt comitted by a Nobleman against his Prince, his p[er]son is attacheable by the lawe, but if a nobleman disobey a decree made in the Chancery in a matter examinable there, hee com[m]itteth a contempt ag[ains]t his Prince, and therefore by the com[m]on lawe his body for his contempt is attachable, and this is rather, because the decrees are given coram nobis in Cancellaria nostra./
Secondly hee saith, That if a Nobleman com[m]itt a contempt against the Queenes Maiesties prerogative, in one of the highest degrees hee com[m]itteth the contempt aforesaid, and his body is attacheable for that by lawe, But if a nobleman disobey1v disobey a decree made in the Chancery and warranted to be made by her highnes prerogative, in one of the highest degrees hee com[m]ittes a contempt against that prerogative, and therefore his body for the same is attacheable by the lawe, and the cause why hee thincketh is this, For that the Prince by his prerogative hath power to order causes otherwise then the lawe is, and to helpe the subiectes in a cause, wherein hee hath no helpe, by which seemes in reason as great as may bee./
Thirdly it hath byn allwayes vsed and accustomed, that
Noblemen have byn and yet are called into the
Chancery for matters examined in the same Court,
and the same proceeded in and ordered and if vse &
custome have allowed of this, then of all congruity
it must allow the necessary dependentes of the same,
which is the execuc[i]on of theis orders, for otherwise
that vse should have byn altogether in vayne, and
other meanes in the Chancery for execuc[i]on of theis
orders, there is none but by Attachment, And
therefore of necessary depend[en]tes vpon such orders thus
vsed, they are to be allowed. And as to that w[hi]ch hath
byn said, that there hath byn no vse of that execuc[i]on
by Attachment. it hath byn aunsweared That
Noblemen were of that considerac[i]on, that they never
disobeyed any of those orders, and therefore no cause
of that vse.
Fowerthly to graunt a Court power to heare and
order, and not to execute the same, is a playne
absurdity. And againe to leave all Coppyholders
of Noblemen in matters without remedy, if they
be removed from their coppyholdes by their Lordes and all2r
and all other men against Noblemen in matters of
equity, seemes a great inconvenience and much
preiudicall to the com[m]on weale considering how great
the number of theis may be, besides what an
inconvenient thing it is, to have a Nobleman bring a
matter in the Chancery, and the Court shall have
power to doe Iustice for him, but not against him.
This is not Ius aequabile, and all the thinges are
to followe in his opinion, except theis Attachm[en]tes
in the cases afore remembred be allowed ./
Fiftly, for as much as the Chancery is warranted to heare and order causes by vertue of the Queenes Maiesties prerogative, where otherwise by lawe the subiect hath an helpe and also to qualifie the extremity of the lawe, Therefore if all causes examinable in Chancery for the respect aforesaid betweene a Nobleman and another man should be taken from the hearing and ordering of that Court, that must needes be in derogation of the same, which hee thincketh ought not to be without the Queenes Maiesties privity, And therefore prayeth as hee hath aforedone, and that her highnes may be made acquainted with this cause, before any order be taken herein ./
Introduction
No introduction.
Manuscript
Norfolk Record Office, RYE 20, Item 2, ff. 1r-2r
Languages: English, Latin
Creation date: c.1572
Authors
Other Witnesses
No witnesses
Seventeenth Century Print Exemplars
No bibliography
Modern Print Exemplars
No bibliography
Selected Criticism
No bibliography
Downloads
Keywords (Text Type)
Keywords (Text Topics)
- law
- Chancery
- legal jurisdiction
Transcribed by:
Victoria Anker (BRIHC Research Impact Fellow), Charlie McClean (Transcription Volunteer), Penny McClean (Transcription Volunteer)